Prompting a New Phase in the Middle East: Iran Claims Victory in Syria


Once again, my empirical realistic perspective proves its competency and applicability. At the significance level, nothing exceptional can be inferred from the Iranian president's visit to Damascus should we apply conventional political analysis methodology. But this will not be the case if we put this visit in the context and perspective set by my latest related articles posted in the latest weeks. Starting from Iran's rising power in Syria and going through my conclusion about Iran's intention and plans to achieve a geopolitical change and advance its interests reaching to the realities of the changing Middle East accompanied by Iran's 'changer' role, we can transparently find out the significance and importance of this visit and its outcomes.

- In general, through the lifespan of the Syrian war, there were no breakthroughs or considerable accomplishments at the level of state-to-state relations between Iran and Syria. Many agreements had been previously signed by the two states that didn't succeed in achieving high trade volume between the two countries or formalizing the Iranian actual linkage with Syria's infrastructure and state executive structure. This is maybe because of the war settings and the Iranian preference and expertise in substate domain and relations over the official formal state level. Hence, the added 15 agreements by this visit are not expected to make a breakthrough in this regard. An exception can be made here, in my opinion, in two fields if Iran has officially obtained Syrian lands in return for its huge debts as it asked earlier, and privileges and rights in the transportation and railways domains, so it can formalize its access to the strategic corridor to the Mediterranean Sea. However, even if this is the case, this would not affect Iran's on-ground dominance and influence on its vital Syrian infrastructure and geography in practical terms.

- A keynote of this visit is its timing, which came after Chinese-brokered Saudi-Iranian rapproachment agreement, and following the start of the Arab normalization course with the Syrian regime and just before the re-admittance of the Syrian regime to the Arab League. For me, it is hard to believe that this normalization and the re-admittance decision was not a part of the Iranian-Saudi agreement. This timing is apparently set to expose this fact as an Iranian accomplishment.

- The milestone of this visit, which summarizes and represents the entire significance and indication of Iran's policy and position in Syria, is the Iranian president's victory speech at Sayyeda Zainab Shiite shrine in Damascus. In this speech in this very particular place and in almost absence of any Syrian official the Iranian president claimed victory. He also did not miss the chance to articulate the advancing "resistance front" that has been advantaged against the "Zionist regime" by the new developments in the region. This iconic scene, as previously mentioned, summarizes and represents the Iranian perception of the regional developments and the resulting Iranian advancement and position in geopolitical terms. It also serves as an indication of the forthcoming Iranian policies and course of action in the Middle East or even beyond. Indigenous Middle Eastern scholars, with unbiased non-ideological realistic methodologies, will find no difficulty reaching this conclusion because they have the mentality of the region and the familiarity with its 'ecosystem' that make the regional political signs and actions comprehensible to them.

In the changing Middle East, Iran has played at the strategic level with a deliberate vision and objectives. In this regard, Iran for reaching the utmost of interests, influence, and geopolitical role, has deployed various kinds of policies and powers ranging from the rapproachment with, let us call it, the eastern side powers particularly the Saudi Arabia and other Sunni countries to the deliberate deployment of powers and assets, including rockets and drones, in front of the western side powers particularly Israel and the United States.

Syria, the strategic geography and the very important and even vital geopolitical arena, which is overlooked and missed by the US and Israel, has been chosen by Iran as the climax center and playground for Iran's regional role and power as demonstrated by this iconic victorious visit and speech in this very particular timing and place. 

This is definitely signaling a new phase in the region marking Iran out as a key regional player with advanced position and role, which has been made possible, in my opinion, by the failing U.S. and Israeli policies in Syria. 

Stay tuned to my Twitter and NeoInternationalism website for the exciting developments in the world's politics.



Popular posts from this blog

Israel's Strategy in Syria: From Enabling Iran to Strategic Loss

Image
Seven months ago, I wrote about the failure of the Israeli policy in Syria, which poses Israel as a main regional loser in the aftermath of the war in Syria. This article has been followed by other articles describing the following changing balance in the Middle East between Israel and Iran to the benefit of Iran and the role of Israeli policies and its traditional strategy and means toward its regional strategic loss. Meanwhile, the Israeli government and intelligence establishment were in quite different place claiming even achievements in Syria as regards Iran's entrenchment there. The academia and research institutions were in-between. Recently, it came to my attention this article by Ehud Yaari, which is the ever best Israeli analysis I have read in months. Finally, there is some scholar in Israel has the realistic and true assessment of the situation in Syria and the Israeli policy there along with the strategic conclusion. This is definitely a useful work, as th
Read more

Netherlands and Canada's ICJ Torture Case Against Syria: A New Era of International Indictment of Sovereign Governments' National Crimes

Image
Netherlands' torture and other ill-treatment case against Syria at the International Court of Justice opens a new chapter in the international order and practice. Although our previous experience with the international order and the international institutions, especially in the Syrian crisis, lets almost no room for any expectations for this case to end torture in Syria or to achieve any difference in the course of action of the Syrian regime, it definitely can lay the foundation for this end by the international documentation, indictment and recognition of these domestic crimes.   In general, this unprecedented ICJ case has a particular international importance as It has a real chance to prompt a beginning of some international system development in terms of the international responsibility and role concerning ill-governance, which is generally fenced by the norm of sovereignty, especially in terms of systematic practice of torture and other kindes of ill-treatment by
Read more

Gambling on the Warhead, Iran Gets the Requisite Missile

Image
It seems that the mainstream media follows the course of their governments in their coverage of political and other related developments. As the US Democrat administrations with many other European governments usually incline to practically overlook the Iranian ballistic missile program and its deployment, the mainstream media also is impacted by this inclination. This is indicated by the light and deficient coverage of the recent Iran's unveiling of the fourth generation of its Khorramshahr ballistic missile with a range of 2,000 km (1,243 miles) and a 1,500 kg (3,300 lb) warhead as reported by the official IRNA news agency.  Iran named it Khaybar in reference to famous Islamic anti-jewish battle alongside a replica of the Al-Aqsa Mosque in the live broadcast of the state television. As usual, Iran directs its rhetoric against Israel and does not miss any show of its power in this regard . This is an official Iranian tradition and an essential pillar of the ideology o
Read more