The Changing Middle East: Traditional Israel and Changer Iran

Only a few days after I inferred Iran's intentions to achieve a change and advanced interests at the regional and international levels derived from its acquired strong regional standing and cards, and a few weeks after writing on Iran's rising power in Syria following the failure of the US and Israeli policies there, a practical proof arose by the latest rocket salvo on Israel. Iran clearly wants new regional rules and position and consequent regional and international recognition of its power and interests. In my opinion, the ultimate prize in this regard that Iran is seeking is to protect its nuclear program and facilities in the pursuit of attaining the implicit regional and explicit international recognition of the reality of the nuclear Iran. 

Iran's new endeavor has been made possible only with its entrenchment in Syria, so the rockets from Syria were the concluding line of the Iranian message of the multi-front rocket salvo. The weakening Russian role in Syria due to the very extreme western pressure following hostilities in Ukraine caused the collapse of the Russian indispensable balance of power with Iran, which added to Iran's power and role, or even made the current Iran position in Syria possible. The importance of the Syrian front for both Iran and Israel is pertaining to its geography and location which connects Iran to Mediterranean Sea and Lebanon, and exposing Israel's most important area to potential threat besides the perks of neighboring Turkey and proximity to the Gulf states. 

The earlier denial or indifference to Iran's accumulated regional power and cards was catastrophic and very harmful to the region and the western interests and influence in the region as demonstrated by recent developments, especially the rising Chinese role in the Middle East. This denial cost the losing of the ability to undertake preemptive measures or policy, which became out of reach and beyond availability. Thus, the only applicable course of action left is of proactive nature while missing a relevant and competent proactive policy for any reason, including the astonishing US negligence by usually the Democrat administrations, will probably means and leads to somehow handing over the region to Iran. 

Apart from the Biden administration's negligence, or even empowerment of Iran in the Middle East, which is consistent with previous Obama administrations' policies and considering the US regional waning role and presence, Israel has exposed misunderstanding of the situation in Syria and its foundations and consequent lack of effectual vision to deal with it. Moreover, Israel still shows this misunderstanding and misbelief, which result in failed policies that worsen the situation in Syria and the region and empower its regional rivals or adversaries putting its security under their threat. Playing old cards in a new game and playing in tactical level in a strategic situation could not be less than destructive and counterproductive at best. Israel is in need of a brand new Syria policy that is based on a new vision besides deploying new means at the strategic level. 

I can see an apparent change in the Middle East is taking place, which is unfortunately faced with a desire and policies of many regional countries including some regional powers that seek to restore the old Middle East and its traditional regional politics in vain of course. In this context, Iran has demonstrated, at least for the time being, the patience, ability and will to mastermind this change and its outcomes to its own benefit, which enables it to gain the upper hand in the current developments in the Middle East.

Stay tuned to my Twitter and NeoInternationalism website for the exciting developments in the world's politics.

Popular posts from this blog

Israel's Strategy in Syria: From Enabling Iran to Strategic Loss

Image
Seven months ago, I wrote about the failure of the Israeli policy in Syria, which poses Israel as a main regional loser in the aftermath of the war in Syria. This article has been followed by other articles describing the following changing balance in the Middle East between Israel and Iran to the benefit of Iran and the role of Israeli policies and its traditional strategy and means toward its regional strategic loss. Meanwhile, the Israeli government and intelligence establishment were in quite different place claiming even achievements in Syria as regards Iran's entrenchment there. The academia and research institutions were in-between. Recently, it came to my attention this article by Ehud Yaari, which is the ever best Israeli analysis I have read in months. Finally, there is some scholar in Israel has the realistic and true assessment of the situation in Syria and the Israeli policy there along with the strategic conclusion. This is definitely a useful work, as th
Read more

Gambling on the Warhead, Iran Gets the Requisite Missile

Image
It seems that the mainstream media follows the course of their governments in their coverage of political and other related developments. As the US Democrat administrations with many other European governments usually incline to practically overlook the Iranian ballistic missile program and its deployment, the mainstream media also is impacted by this inclination. This is indicated by the light and deficient coverage of the recent Iran's unveiling of the fourth generation of its Khorramshahr ballistic missile with a range of 2,000 km (1,243 miles) and a 1,500 kg (3,300 lb) warhead as reported by the official IRNA news agency.  Iran named it Khaybar in reference to famous Islamic anti-jewish battle alongside a replica of the Al-Aqsa Mosque in the live broadcast of the state television. As usual, Iran directs its rhetoric against Israel and does not miss any show of its power in this regard . This is an official Iranian tradition and an essential pillar of the ideology o
Read more

Netherlands and Canada's ICJ Torture Case Against Syria: A New Era of International Indictment of Sovereign Governments' National Crimes

Image
Netherlands' torture and other ill-treatment case against Syria at the International Court of Justice opens a new chapter in the international order and practice. Although our previous experience with the international order and the international institutions, especially in the Syrian crisis, lets almost no room for any expectations for this case to end torture in Syria or to achieve any difference in the course of action of the Syrian regime, it definitely can lay the foundation for this end by the international documentation, indictment and recognition of these domestic crimes.   In general, this unprecedented ICJ case has a particular international importance as It has a real chance to prompt a beginning of some international system development in terms of the international responsibility and role concerning ill-governance, which is generally fenced by the norm of sovereignty, especially in terms of systematic practice of torture and other kindes of ill-treatment by
Read more